Auditors' going concern reporting in the pre- and post-bankruptcy law eras : Chinese affiliates of big 4 versus local auditors
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews (RGC: 21, 22, 62) › 21_Publication in refereed journal › peer-review
Author(s)
Related Research Unit(s)
Detail(s)
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1-30 |
Journal / Publication | The International Journal of Accounting |
Volume | 50 |
Issue number | 1 |
Online published | 8 Jan 2015 |
Publication status | Published - Mar 2015 |
Link(s)
Abstract
Unlike the situation in most developed countries, before the enactment of China's 2006 Bankruptcy Law it was difficult for Chinese-listed companies, which were mostly government owned, to declare bankruptcy. Our analysis of a sample of Chinese financially-distressed companies from 2001 to 2010 reveals that the Chinese affiliates of Big 4 auditors had a higher propensity to issue going concern (GC) reports than local auditors not only in the post-law period, but also in the pre-law period. This finding suggests that Big 4 auditors had incentives to maintain their reputations even when the clients' bankruptcy risk was low. We also find that there was a significant increase in local top-10 auditors' GC reporting propensity in the post-law period, which is consistent with the notion that the increased litigation/regulation risk due to the enactment of Bankruptcy Law has an effect on local large auditors.
Research Area(s)
- Bankruptcy Law, Chinese affiliates of Big 4 auditors, Going concern opinions, Local auditors
Citation Format(s)
Auditors' going concern reporting in the pre- and post-bankruptcy law eras : Chinese affiliates of big 4 versus local auditors. / Mo, Phyllis L.L.; Rui, Oliver M.; Wu, Xi.
In: The International Journal of Accounting, Vol. 50, No. 1, 03.2015, p. 1-30.Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews (RGC: 21, 22, 62) › 21_Publication in refereed journal › peer-review