TY - JOUR
T1 - Attempted definition by immunoblotting of the causes of reactivity in suspected false-positive sera in the Brucella ovis complement fixation test
AU - Kittelberger, R.
AU - Laybourn, B. J.
AU - Reichel, M. P.
AU - Ross, G. P.
AU - De Lisle, G. W.
AU - Joyce, M. A.
PY - 1996/10
Y1 - 1996/10
N2 - Seventy-nine suspected false-positive sera, obtained over 1 year from routine submissions for Brucella ovis serological testing, were used in this study. These sera, which exhibited titres in the complement fixation test, but which because of their epidemiological history and their reactions in the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and gel diffusion test were suspected to be false positives, were further analysed by immunoblotting. In blots, using B. ovis antigens, rough lipopolysaccharide was identified as the major, immuno-reactive bacterial component. Antibodies against this macromolecule were present in 46.8% of the suspected false-positive sera. In order to find out if rough lipopolysaccharides from other bacterial species could be the possible cause for the suspected false positivity, 23 sera with highest complement fixation titres were reacted in blots with cell extracts from Escherichia coli, Yersinia enterocolitica, Yersinia pseudotuberculosis, Bortedella bronchiseptica, Actinobacillus seminis, Campylobacter fetus fetus, Campylobacter jejuni, Mycobacterium paratuberculosis, Mycobacterium phlei, Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis and pure lipopolysaccharides from Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium. Despite high frequencies of antibody reaction with proteins in most of these bacterial cell extracts, which reflect the presence of infections with these bacteria, immuno-staining in the rough lipopolysaccharide region was not observed.
AB - Seventy-nine suspected false-positive sera, obtained over 1 year from routine submissions for Brucella ovis serological testing, were used in this study. These sera, which exhibited titres in the complement fixation test, but which because of their epidemiological history and their reactions in the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and gel diffusion test were suspected to be false positives, were further analysed by immunoblotting. In blots, using B. ovis antigens, rough lipopolysaccharide was identified as the major, immuno-reactive bacterial component. Antibodies against this macromolecule were present in 46.8% of the suspected false-positive sera. In order to find out if rough lipopolysaccharides from other bacterial species could be the possible cause for the suspected false positivity, 23 sera with highest complement fixation titres were reacted in blots with cell extracts from Escherichia coli, Yersinia enterocolitica, Yersinia pseudotuberculosis, Bortedella bronchiseptica, Actinobacillus seminis, Campylobacter fetus fetus, Campylobacter jejuni, Mycobacterium paratuberculosis, Mycobacterium phlei, Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis and pure lipopolysaccharides from Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium. Despite high frequencies of antibody reaction with proteins in most of these bacterial cell extracts, which reflect the presence of infections with these bacteria, immuno-staining in the rough lipopolysaccharide region was not observed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0010727499&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.scopus.com/record/pubmetrics.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0010727499&origin=recordpage
U2 - 10.1080/00480169.1996.35966
DO - 10.1080/00480169.1996.35966
M3 - RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal
SN - 0048-0169
VL - 44
SP - 170
EP - 174
JO - New Zealand Veterinary Journal
JF - New Zealand Veterinary Journal
IS - 5
ER -