Assessment of alternative ventilation schemes at public transport interchange
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review
Author(s)
Detail(s)
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 447-458 |
Journal / Publication | Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment |
Volume | 11 |
Issue number | 6 |
Publication status | Published - Nov 2006 |
Link(s)
Abstract
The provision of mechanical ventilation in a semi-confined public transport interchange is mandatory in Hong Kong. The authority recommends the general use of low-level-supply and high-level-exhaust airflow schemes that different from the traditional ventilation concept in that low-level emitted vehicle pollutants are best removed at source. Analyses of air quality at typical public transport interchange environments are conducted for the two airflow schemes. The CFD simulations are generalized by studying light and heavy traffic conditions with adjusted ventilation rates to match the change in vehicle emission levels to examine pollutant concentrations at passenger waiting areas and the elevated footbridges. While the conventional high-level-supply and low-level-exhaust scheme could perform better during light traffic loads, the difference diminishes with increased traffic loads during peak hours. On the other hand, the high-level exhaust scheme has an advantage of serving as a smoke extraction system during a fire outbreak. © 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Research Area(s)
- Mechanical ventilation, Numerical airflow analysis, Public transport interchange
Citation Format(s)
Assessment of alternative ventilation schemes at public transport interchange. / Chow, T. T.; Lin, Zhang; Bai, Wei.
In: Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 11, No. 6, 11.2006, p. 447-458.
In: Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 11, No. 6, 11.2006, p. 447-458.
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review