Assessment criteria in audio describer training : An investigation of learner perceptions in a university interpreting programme in Hong Kong of China

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

1 Scopus Citations
View graph of relations

Detail(s)

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)26-43
Journal / PublicationInterpreting and Society: An Interdisciplinary Journal
Volume4
Issue number1
Online published28 Oct 2023
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2024

Link(s)

Abstract

Audio description (AD), which renders images into words, is an important subject in the field of translation studies. Audio describer training (ADT) is provided in university translation programmes. However, research on AD pedagogy remains limited, and there are even fewer studies on AD learners. Based on the commonalities between AD and interpreting, especially in terms of quality assessment criteria, this study explored students’ perceptions of ADT and interpreter training in a postgraduate programme in Hong Kong of China. An Audio Description Rating Scale (ADRS) was designed to collect students’ perceptions of ADT, with a focus on quality assessment criteria. Thirty-six students participated in the study. The results show that three particular criteria of AD were identified as the most difficult to achieve: “no unjustified addition,” “appropriate language styles,” and “synchronisation with images.” Furthermore, significant correlations were found between students’ perceptions of certain AD and interpreting criteria, and between interpreting proficiency and AD learning. Individual differences were also recognised in AD learners. The findings shed light on the interactions between the learning of AD and interpreting. The study is expected to inspire trainers to develop more diverse and refined integrations of ADT into existing translation programmes. © The Author(s) 2023.

Research Area(s)

  • assessment criteria, audio describer training, audio description, interpreter training, interpreting studies

Citation Format(s)

Download Statistics

No data available