TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessing factor structure and convergent validity of the work regulatory focus scale
AU - Akhtar, Syed
AU - Lee, Jenny S.Y.
PY - 2014/8
Y1 - 2014/8
N2 - This study assessed the factor structure of the Work Regulatory Focus Scale, which includes work-related prevention and promotion as dimensions of regulatory focus. To examine the concurrent validity, these dimensions were correlated with the prevention and promotion subscales of the Chronic Regulatory Focus Questionnaire. Using computer-assisted telephone interviews, data were collected from 237 full-time working people in Hong Kong, with a response rate of 72.9%. A confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the two-factor model of the Work Regulatory Focus Scale fit the data adequately. Fit indices improved after two of the items with low factor loadings on the promotion focus dimension were excluded from the analysis, which left 10 items in the scale. Pearson correlations between work-related regulatory focus subscales and chronic regulatory focus sub-scales were low but significant (range,.19-.39). The mean score differences between regulatory focus subscales were mostly in the expected direction, providing convergent validity evidence. The implications of these findings and suggestions for future research on the validity of the scale were discussed. © Psychological Reports 2014.
AB - This study assessed the factor structure of the Work Regulatory Focus Scale, which includes work-related prevention and promotion as dimensions of regulatory focus. To examine the concurrent validity, these dimensions were correlated with the prevention and promotion subscales of the Chronic Regulatory Focus Questionnaire. Using computer-assisted telephone interviews, data were collected from 237 full-time working people in Hong Kong, with a response rate of 72.9%. A confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the two-factor model of the Work Regulatory Focus Scale fit the data adequately. Fit indices improved after two of the items with low factor loadings on the promotion focus dimension were excluded from the analysis, which left 10 items in the scale. Pearson correlations between work-related regulatory focus subscales and chronic regulatory focus sub-scales were low but significant (range,.19-.39). The mean score differences between regulatory focus subscales were mostly in the expected direction, providing convergent validity evidence. The implications of these findings and suggestions for future research on the validity of the scale were discussed. © Psychological Reports 2014.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84906736117&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.scopus.com/record/pubmetrics.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84906736117&origin=recordpage
U2 - 10.2466/08.01.PR0.115c13z5
DO - 10.2466/08.01.PR0.115c13z5
M3 - RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal
C2 - 25153955
SN - 0033-2941
VL - 115
SP - 133
EP - 147
JO - Psychological Reports
JF - Psychological Reports
IS - 1
ER -