Are Street-Level Bureaucrats in China Hardnosed Cops or Consultants? An Institutional Account of Policing Behavior in Autocracy
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review
Author(s)
Related Research Unit(s)
Detail(s)
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 232-244 |
Journal / Publication | Journal of Contemporary China |
Volume | 18 |
Issue number | 116 |
Online published | 12 Sept 2018 |
Publication status | Published - Mar 2019 |
Link(s)
Abstract
Chengguan (城管) is part of the stability maintenance regime specializing in civil law enforcement in China. Many protests today have occurred in reaction to Chengguan harsh enforcement rather than police action. Using survey data (n = 1,721) from China, the authors found both severity and leniency in Chengguan law enforcement. The authors also found that Chengguan enforcement styles are largely conciliatory rather than legalistic, and that Chengguan officers are more likely to be harsh during politically important periods than during politically unimportant periods. The authors explain the temporal variation in Chengguan severity and leniency with three institutional factors of autocracy: resource constraints, upward accountability, and the politics of ritual events. This study offers a new account of law enforcement in China.
Bibliographic Note
Full text of this publication does not contain sufficient affiliation information. With consent from the author(s) concerned, the Research Unit(s) information for this record is based on the existing academic department affiliation of the author(s).
Citation Format(s)
Are Street-Level Bureaucrats in China Hardnosed Cops or Consultants? An Institutional Account of Policing Behavior in Autocracy. / Zang, Xiaowei; Pratt, John.
In: Journal of Contemporary China, Vol. 18, No. 116, 03.2019, p. 232-244.
In: Journal of Contemporary China, Vol. 18, No. 116, 03.2019, p. 232-244.
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review