Are Related-Party Sales Value-Adding or Value-Destroying? Evidence from China

Raymond M. K. Wong*, Jeong-Bon Kim, Agnes W. Y. Lo

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

53 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Prior literature provides mixed and relatively little evidence on the economic consequences of related-party transactions. We examine a hitherto underexplored issue of whether transactions among firms within the same business group increase or reduce firm value. Using a large sample of Chinese listed firms, we find that related-party sales increase firm value. However, this value enhancement disappears for firms with (i) large percentage of parent directors, (ii) high government ownership, or (iii) tax avoidance incentives that often couple with management's rent extraction activities. Although we find that intragroup sales improve firm value in general, we also find that corporate insiders use intragroup sales to deprive value from minority shareholders. Overall, our findings highlight the interplay between ownership structure and tax avoidance incentives in determining the economic consequences of related-party transactions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-38
JournalJournal of International Financial Management & Accounting
Volume26
Issue number1
Online published19 Jan 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2015

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Are Related-Party Sales Value-Adding or Value-Destroying? Evidence from China'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this