Are “justified” biases acceptable? Citizens’ perceptions of gendered government hiring

Yao Wang*, Ning Liu, Richard M. Walker

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

Abstract

Gender-biased recruitment persists in many public institutions, yet its impact on public perception remains underexplored. This study investigates citizens’ perceptions of gender-targeted recruitment through a survey experiment with follow-up interviews conducted in China. Analysis of quantitative and qualitative data reveals that gender-targeted job advertisement negatively impacts perceived fairness and reasonableness in government hiring, particularly when favouring men. However, ‘justifications’ for gender preferences, aligning with role congruity theory, can mitigate this negative effect. This research highlights the importance of addressing gender bias in government hiring to maintain public trust and alerts the subtle ways biases can be legitimized. © 2025 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group
Original languageEnglish
JournalPublic Management Review
Online published27 Mar 2025
DOIs
Publication statusOnline published - 27 Mar 2025

Funding

We acknowledge funding support from the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Project No. CityU11601422.

Research Keywords

  • Gender-targeted recruitmen
  • perceived fairness
  • role congruity theory
  • survey experiment
  • interviews

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Are “justified” biases acceptable? Citizens’ perceptions of gendered government hiring'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this