TY - JOUR
T1 - Application of Machine Learning in Nanotoxicology
T2 - A Critical Review and Perspective
AU - Zhou, Yunchi
AU - Wang, Ying
AU - Peijnenburg, Willie
AU - Vijver, Martina G.
AU - Balraadjsing, Surendra
AU - Dong, Zhaomin
AU - Zhao, Xiaoli
AU - Leung, Kenneth M. Y.
AU - Mortensen, Holly M.
AU - Wang, Zhenyu
AU - Lynch, Iseult
AU - Afantitis, Antreas
AU - Mu, Yunsong
AU - Wu, Fengchang
AU - Fan, Wenhong
PY - 2024/8/27
Y1 - 2024/8/27
N2 - The massive production and application of nanomaterials (NMs) have raised concerns about the potential adverse effects of NMs on human health and the environment. Evaluating the adverse effects of NMs by laboratory methods is expensive, time-consuming, and often fails to keep pace with the invention of new materials. Therefore, in silico methods that utilize machine learning techniques to predict the toxicity potentials of NMs are a promising alternative approach if regulatory confidence in them can be enhanced. Previous reviews and regulatory OECD guidance documents have discussed in detail how to build an in silico predictive model for NMs. Nevertheless, there is still room for improvement in addressing the ways to enhance the model representativeness and performance from different angles, such as data set curation, descriptor selection, task type (classification/regression), algorithm choice, and model evaluation (internal and external validation, applicability domain, and mechanistic interpretation, which is key to ensuring stakeholder confidence). This review explores how to build better predictive models; the current state of the art is analyzed via a statistical evaluation of literature, while the challenges faced and future perspectives are summarized. Moreover, a recommended workflow and best practices are provided to help in developing more predictive, reliable, and interpretable models that can assist risk assessment as well as safe-by-design development of NMs. © 2024 American Chemical Society.
AB - The massive production and application of nanomaterials (NMs) have raised concerns about the potential adverse effects of NMs on human health and the environment. Evaluating the adverse effects of NMs by laboratory methods is expensive, time-consuming, and often fails to keep pace with the invention of new materials. Therefore, in silico methods that utilize machine learning techniques to predict the toxicity potentials of NMs are a promising alternative approach if regulatory confidence in them can be enhanced. Previous reviews and regulatory OECD guidance documents have discussed in detail how to build an in silico predictive model for NMs. Nevertheless, there is still room for improvement in addressing the ways to enhance the model representativeness and performance from different angles, such as data set curation, descriptor selection, task type (classification/regression), algorithm choice, and model evaluation (internal and external validation, applicability domain, and mechanistic interpretation, which is key to ensuring stakeholder confidence). This review explores how to build better predictive models; the current state of the art is analyzed via a statistical evaluation of literature, while the challenges faced and future perspectives are summarized. Moreover, a recommended workflow and best practices are provided to help in developing more predictive, reliable, and interpretable models that can assist risk assessment as well as safe-by-design development of NMs. © 2024 American Chemical Society.
KW - algorithm
KW - classification/regression
KW - computational toxicity
KW - machine learning
KW - nanomaterials
KW - prediction
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85200818328&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.scopus.com/record/pubmetrics.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85200818328&origin=recordpage
U2 - 10.1021/acs.est.4c03328
DO - 10.1021/acs.est.4c03328
M3 - RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal
SN - 0013-936X
VL - 58
SP - 14973
EP - 14993
JO - Environmental Science & Technology
JF - Environmental Science & Technology
IS - 34
ER -