Analyst Coverage and Expected Crash Risk: Evidence from Exogenous Changes in Analyst Coverage

Jeong-Bon KIM, Louise Yi Lu, Yangxin YU

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

172 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Using brokerage mergers and closures as two sources of exogenous shock to analyst coverage, this study explores the causal effect of analyst coverage on ex ante expected crash risk as captured by the options implied volatility smirk. We find a significant increase in a firm's ex ante expected crash risk subsequent to an exogenous drop in analyst coverage; this positive effect is stronger for firms initially receiving less coverage. Further, we find analysts' ability matters to investors' assessment of future crash risk. Specifically, we find the impact is more pronounced for the coverage terminations of analysts with more firm-specific or general experience, with greater access to resources, or whose prior forecasts are more accurate than those of their peers. Overall, our results suggest that investors in the options market do recognize analysts as important information intermediaries and monitors, and thus, that analyst coverage influences the underlying stock's expected crash risk.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)345-364
JournalThe Accounting Review
Volume94
Issue number4
Online publishedSept 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2019

Bibliographical note

Research Unit(s) information for this publication is provided by the author(s) concerned.

Research Keywords

  • Analyst coverage
  • Bad news hoarding
  • Expected crash risk

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Analyst Coverage and Expected Crash Risk: Evidence from Exogenous Changes in Analyst Coverage'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this