Analyst Coverage and Expected Crash Risk : Evidence from Exogenous Changes in Analyst Coverage
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review
Author(s)
Related Research Unit(s)
Detail(s)
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 345-364 |
Journal / Publication | The Accounting Review |
Volume | 94 |
Issue number | 4 |
Online published | Sept 2018 |
Publication status | Published - Jul 2019 |
Link(s)
Abstract
Using brokerage mergers and closures as two sources of exogenous shock to analyst coverage, this study explores the causal effect of analyst coverage on ex ante expected crash risk as captured by the options implied volatility smirk. We find a significant increase in a firm's ex ante expected crash risk subsequent to an exogenous drop in analyst coverage; this positive effect is stronger for firms initially receiving less coverage. Further, we find analysts' ability matters to investors' assessment of future crash risk. Specifically, we find the impact is more pronounced for the coverage terminations of analysts with more firm-specific or general experience, with greater access to resources, or whose prior forecasts are more accurate than those of their peers. Overall, our results suggest that investors in the options market do recognize analysts as important information intermediaries and monitors, and thus, that analyst coverage influences the underlying stock's expected crash risk.
Research Area(s)
- Analyst coverage, Bad news hoarding, Expected crash risk
Bibliographic Note
Research Unit(s) information for this publication is provided by the author(s) concerned.
Citation Format(s)
Analyst Coverage and Expected Crash Risk: Evidence from Exogenous Changes in Analyst Coverage. / KIM, Jeong-Bon; Lu, Louise Yi; YU, Yangxin.
In: The Accounting Review, Vol. 94, No. 4, 07.2019, p. 345-364.
In: The Accounting Review, Vol. 94, No. 4, 07.2019, p. 345-364.
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review