An over-sampling method for analogy-based software effort estimation
Research output: Chapters, Conference Papers, Creative and Literary Works › RGC 32 - Refereed conference paper (with host publication) › peer-review
Author(s)
Detail(s)
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | ESEM'08: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement |
Pages | 312-314 |
Publication status | Published - 2008 |
Externally published | Yes |
Conference
Title | 2nd International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, ESEM 2008 |
---|---|
Place | Germany |
City | Kaiserslautern |
Period | 9 - 10 October 2008 |
Link(s)
Abstract
This paper proposes a novel method to generate synthetic project cases and add them to a fit dataset for the purpose of improving the performance of analogy-based software effort estimation. The proposed method extends conventional over-sampling method, which is a preprocessing procedure for n-group classification problems, which makes it suitable for any unbalanced dataset to be used in analogy-based system. We experimentally evaluated the effect of the over-sampling method to improve the performance of the analogy-based software effort estimation by using the Desharnais dataset. Results show significant improvement to the estimation accuracy by using our approach. Copyright 2008 ACM.
Research Area(s)
- Analogy, Empirical study, Over-sampling, Software effort estimation
Citation Format(s)
An over-sampling method for analogy-based software effort estimation. / Kamei, Yasutaka; Keung, Jacky; Monden, Akito et al.
ESEM'08: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement. 2008. p. 312-314.
ESEM'08: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement. 2008. p. 312-314.
Research output: Chapters, Conference Papers, Creative and Literary Works › RGC 32 - Refereed conference paper (with host publication) › peer-review