Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

An integrated techno-economic analysis on wastewater reclamation in Hong Kong: A comprehensive cost – Benefit analysis with life cycle assessment

Joonho Yeo, Shauhrat S. Chopra, David von Eiff, Sanghyun Jeong, Lin Zhang*, Alicia Kyoungjin An*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

125 Downloads (CityUHK Scholars)

Abstract

Wastewater reclamation and reuse projects have been gaining significant attention as ways to secure sustainable water resources while preventing environmental degradation. However, traditional cost-benefit analyses do not reflect the true net benefits of these processes as they do not consider all externalities, particularly due to the difficulties in monetizing environmental impacts, thereby leading to underutilization. In this study, we conducted a hybrid cost-benefit analysis with an integrated environmental externality approach to evaluate the true net benefit of wastewater treatment and reclamation with explicit and implicit costs and estimated benefits. Firstly, we developed a cost-benefit analysis model based on the Drainage Service Department's statistical data from the Shek Wu Hui plant in Hong Kong from 2014 to 2018. Next, we estimated the external environmental benefits from pollutant abatement based on the shadow price of each pollutant by adopting a distance frontier function. We then conducted a life-cycle assessment to investigate the potential environmental impacts of the process using SimaPro 8.5.2.0 software and the EcoInvent 3 database, utilizing Stepwise2006 methodology for full monetization. A sensitivity analysis was applied to control for uncertainties as a robustness check. Our results show that aggregate cost, shadow price, and monetized environmental impact are estimated to be 4.47, 4.75, and 1.23 HKD per m3 of treated water respectively. Based on these results, our study illustrates that the true benefit is noticeably higher than the unit cost of wastewater reclamation, dependent upon a scale, and represents a breakeven point of 63,769 m3 of water reclamation per day. Our study further demonstrates that wastewater reclamation is viable from both social and economic perspectives and will increase the government budget by 81 million HKD. Therefore, this study can provide a basic guideline for developing a more complete economic valuation of wastewater treatment and reclamation projects.
Original languageEnglish
Article number131838
JournalJournal of Cleaner Production
Volume357
Online published19 Apr 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 10 Jul 2022

Funding

This work was supported by the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special 548 Administrative Region, China (Project Nos. T21-604/19-R, 11207717 and 11213819) and the 549 Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) 550 funded by the Ministry of Education (Project Nos. 2017R1A6A3A04004335).

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 6 - Clean Water and Sanitation
    SDG 6 Clean Water and Sanitation
  2. SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth
    SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
  3. SDG 9 - Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
    SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
  4. SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production
    SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
  5. SDG 15 - Life on Land
    SDG 15 Life on Land

Research Keywords

  • Cost-benefit analysis
  • External benefit
  • Life-cycle assessment
  • Shadow price
  • Wastewater treatment
  • Water reclamation

Publisher's Copyright Statement

  • COPYRIGHT TERMS OF DEPOSITED POSTPRINT FILE: © 2022. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

RGC Funding Information

  • RGC-funded

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An integrated techno-economic analysis on wastewater reclamation in Hong Kong: A comprehensive cost – Benefit analysis with life cycle assessment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this