Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

An epistemic case for confucian democracy

Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review

Abstract

This paper examines the relationship between democratic participation and the well-being of the people – a fundamental aim of Confucian government. It argues that although the value of democratic participation for people’s moral cultivation may be dubious (as suggested recently by Sungmoon Kim), democratic participation is key to meeting other salient aspects of people’s well-being. Drawing on developments in Western epistemic analyses of democracy, this paper shows that the complexity of political issues in developed countries makes democracy an important decision-making process to enhance the well-being of most of the members of society. © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1005-1027
Number of pages23
JournalCritical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy
Volume26
Issue number7
Online published23 Oct 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2023
Externally publishedYes

Funding

This work was supported by the Research programme ‘Ethics of Socially Disruptive Technologies’, the Gravitation programme of the Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture, and Science and the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research [024.004.031].

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Research Keywords

  • Confucianism
  • epistemic democracy
  • well-being
  • political participation
  • democratic participation
  • confucian political meritocracy

Publisher's Copyright Statement

  • This full text is made available under CC-BY 4.0. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An epistemic case for confucian democracy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this