Abstract
Mitigation of climate change requires comprehensive policy arrangements. This article applies a systematic analysis framework comprising ‘vertical policy hierarchy—horizontal policy path—policy instruments’ with Germany, France, and the Netherlands as study cases, and first-hand policy and data from government websites collected, clustered, and matched. The study conducts a comparative analysis of the three countries’ systems, pathways, instruments, and their effectiveness in climate change mitigation. The findings indicate that, firstly, all three countries have relatively well-developed policy systems (laws, regulations, strategies, plans, and policy instruments) based on the six vertical policy hierarchy defined by government governance structure. Secondly, the three countries exhibit commonalities and disparities in seven sectors: energy, transport, buildings, industry, agriculture, forest, and waste. The commonalities stem from EU laws and directives, while disparities arise from resource endowments and emission structures. Thirdly, regarding policy instruments, the commonalities among the three countries are reflected in the dominance of Financial/Fiscal Mechanisms as the primary approach, the leadership position of Governance Mechanisms, the comprehensive coverage of Regulatory Reform, and the massive expenditure in the Direct investment. Individually, (1) the German Regulatory Reform primarily addresses energy resource transformation; France focuses on controlling the transport sector emissions; while the Netherlands commits to renewable energy generation. (2) Germany leads in terms of Commercialization Mechanisms. (3) Financial/Fiscal Mechanisms encompass all sectors, while Germany examplifies the transportation sector digitization, France’s provision of ecological housing loans, and the Netherlands’ support for sustainable agriculture. (4) France distinguishes itself with a forward-thinking approach towards Governance Mechanism including climate financial risks, ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) standards. Fourthly, the significant policy instruments analysis demonstrates that the climate governance of three countries incorporates not only direct or indirect efforts in emission reduction, but also considerations of institutional requirements, fairness, economic effectiveness, synergies, and transformative potential in policy considerations. © 2023 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 103001 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Environmental Research Letters |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue number | 10 |
| Online published | 14 Sept 2023 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Oct 2023 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 2 Zero Hunger
-
SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
-
SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
-
SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
-
SDG 13 Climate Action
-
SDG 15 Life on Land
-
SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals
Research Keywords
- carbon neutrality
- climate change mitigation
- greenhouse gas emissions reductions
- policy instrument
- policy review
Publisher's Copyright Statement
- This full text is made available under CC-BY 4.0. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Policy Impact
- Cited in Policy Documents
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'An advanced review of climate change mitigation policies in Germany, France, and the Netherlands'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver