Alternative Agency Relationships for Offshore Audits and Audit Quality : Evidence from U.S.-listed Foreign Companies

Research output: Conference Papers (RGC: 31A, 31B, 32, 33)32_Refereed conference paper (no ISBN/ISSN)peer-review

View graph of relations

Author(s)

Related Research Unit(s)

Detail(s)

Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - May 2019

Conference

Title29th Audit & Assurance Conference
LocationAston University
PlaceUnited Kingdom
CityBirmaingham
Period23 - 24 May 2019

Abstract

Auditors of multinational companies often engage other auditors to conduct a significant part of their audit work for their foreign clients. Using a sample of U.S.-listed Chinese companies, we examine the audit quality for firms audited by U.S. auditors under alternative agency relationships with other auditors in China. We find higher quality audits for companies audited by U.S. auditors with affiliates (member firms of global audit networks or auditors with China offices) than U.S. auditors without affiliates in China. We also find U.S. auditors that have offices in China provide higher quality audits than those that are member firms of global audit networks, but there is no significant difference between the use of U.S. and Chinese member firms as signing auditors. Our findings offer useful implications for financial statement users, audit firms and regulators regarding the quality of audits involving other auditors under alternative agency relationships.

Bibliographic Note

Information for this record is supplemented by the author(s) concerned.

Citation Format(s)

Alternative Agency Relationships for Offshore Audits and Audit Quality : Evidence from U.S.-listed Foreign Companies. / Chan, K. Hung; Guo, Yingwen; Mo, Phyllis Lai Lan.

2019. Paper presented at 29th Audit & Assurance Conference, Birmaingham, United Kingdom.

Research output: Conference Papers (RGC: 31A, 31B, 32, 33)32_Refereed conference paper (no ISBN/ISSN)peer-review