Abstract
Auditors of multinational companies often engage other auditors to conduct a significant part of their audit work for their foreign clients. Using a sample of U.S.-listed Chinese companies, we examine the audit quality for firms audited by U.S. auditors under alternative agency relationships with other auditors in China. We find higher quality audits for companies audited by U.S. auditors with affiliates (member firms of global audit networks or auditors with China offices) than U.S. auditors without affiliates in China. We also find U.S. auditors that have offices in China provide higher quality audits than those that are member firms of global audit networks, but there is no significant difference between the use of U.S. and Chinese member firms as signing auditors. Our findings offer useful implications for financial statement users, audit firms and regulators regarding the quality of audits involving other auditors under alternative agency relationships.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Publication status | Published - May 2019 |
| Event | 29th Audit & Assurance Conference - Aston University, Birmaingham, United Kingdom Duration: 23 May 2019 → 24 May 2019 Conference number: 29 http://static.aston.ac.uk/asig/NAC2019%20-%20registration%20&%20conference%20programme.htm http://static.aston.ac.uk/asig/Programme_Preliminary%204.pdf |
Conference
| Conference | 29th Audit & Assurance Conference |
|---|---|
| Place | United Kingdom |
| City | Birmaingham |
| Period | 23/05/19 → 24/05/19 |
| Internet address |
Bibliographical note
Information for this record is supplemented by the author(s) concerned.Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Alternative Agency Relationships for Offshore Audits and Audit Quality: Evidence from U.S.-listed Foreign Companies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver