Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Alternative Agency Relationships for Offshore Audits and Audit Quality: Evidence from U.S.-listed Foreign Companies

Research output: Conference PapersRGC 32 - Refereed conference paper (without host publication)peer-review

Abstract

Auditors of multinational companies often engage other auditors to conduct a significant part of their audit work for their foreign clients. Using a sample of U.S.-listed Chinese companies, we examine the audit quality for firms audited by U.S. auditors under alternative agency relationships with other auditors in China. We find higher quality audits for companies audited by U.S. auditors with affiliates (member firms of global audit networks or auditors with China offices) than U.S. auditors without affiliates in China. We also find U.S. auditors that have offices in China provide higher quality audits than those that are member firms of global audit networks, but there is no significant difference between the use of U.S. and Chinese member firms as signing auditors. Our findings offer useful implications for financial statement users, audit firms and regulators regarding the quality of audits involving other auditors under alternative agency relationships.
Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - May 2019
Event29th Audit & Assurance Conference - Aston University, Birmaingham, United Kingdom
Duration: 23 May 201924 May 2019
Conference number: 29
http://static.aston.ac.uk/asig/NAC2019%20-%20registration%20&%20conference%20programme.htm
http://static.aston.ac.uk/asig/Programme_Preliminary%204.pdf

Conference

Conference29th Audit & Assurance Conference
PlaceUnited Kingdom
CityBirmaingham
Period23/05/1924/05/19
Internet address

Bibliographical note

Information for this record is supplemented by the author(s) concerned.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Alternative Agency Relationships for Offshore Audits and Audit Quality: Evidence from U.S.-listed Foreign Companies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this