Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

All HER2-negative breast cancer patients need gBRCA testing: cost-effectiveness and clinical benefits

  • Huai-liang Wu
  • , Zi-yin Luo
  • , Zong-lin He
  • , Yue Gong
  • , Miao Mo
  • , Wai-kit Ming
  • , Guang-yu Liu*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

52 Downloads (CityUHK Scholars)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The OlympiA trial demonstrated the benefits of adjuvant usage of olaparib for high-risk patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer (BC) and germline BRCA (gBRCA) mutation. This provoked thoughts on the clinical criteria of gBRCA testing. This study aims to estimate the costs and benefits of gBRCA testing and adjuvant olaparib therapy for patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and hormone-receptor (HR)-positive and HER2-negative BC in China and the United States of America (USA).

METHODS: We used a Markov chain decision tree analytic model to compare three gBRCA screening policies in China and the USA: (1) no gBRCA testing; (2) selected gBRCA testing and (3) universal gBRCA testing for nonmetastatic TNBC and HR-positive HER2-negative BC patients. We modelled the benefit of systemic therapy and risk-reducing surgeries among patients identified with pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants (PVs) in BRCA1 and BRCA2.

© The Author(s) 2022, corrected publication 2023

RESULTS: Changing from the selected gBRCA testing to the universal gBRCA testing in TNBC patients is cost-effective, with the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) being 10991.1 and 56518.2 USD/QALY in China and the USA, respectively. Expanding universal gBRCA testing to HR-positive HER2-negative BC and TNBC patients has ICERs of 2023.3 and 16611.1 USD/QALY in China and the USA, respectively.

DISCUSSION: By performing gBRCA testing on all HER2-negative BC patients, adjuvant olaparib can be offered to high-risk patients with a PV in BRCA1 or BRCA2. These patients are also candidates for risk-reducing surgeries, an important aspect of their survivorship care, and these interventions can improve survival outcomes. With the willingness-to-pay thresholds being 31,500.0 and 100,000.0 USD per QALY gained in China and the USA, respectively, universal gBRCA testing is likely cost-effective for all HER2-negative BC patients. This simplified criterion of gBRCA testing for BC is recommended for adoption by current guidelines in China and the USA.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)638-646
Number of pages9
JournalBritish Journal of Cancer
Volume128
Issue number4
Online published23 Dec 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2023

Bibliographical note

© 2022. The Author(s).

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Research Keywords

  • Female
  • Humans
  • Breast Neoplasms/pathology
  • China
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Germ-Line Mutation
  • Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/pathology
  • United States

Publisher's Copyright Statement

  • This full text is made available under CC-BY 4.0. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'All HER2-negative breast cancer patients need gBRCA testing: cost-effectiveness and clinical benefits'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this