Abstract
We examine the implications of competitive algorithmic targeting when outcomes of targeting algorithms are the individual consumer-level predicted probabilities of conversion. In these situations, firms implicitly face the well-known precision-recall tradeoff while choosing their targeting strategies. They can choose to target a smaller set of consumers with a high probability of conversion (precision) but miss out on many consumers who might still be interested in their product. Conversely, firms can target a larger set of consumers (recall), but this results in a greater probability that their targeting is wasted on uninterested consumers. We analyze this precision-recall tradeoff under competition between firms that strategically choose their algorithmic targeting policies. We show that competing firms favor a targeting policy that has higher precision but lower recall compared with a monopoly. Firms target fewer consumers when their algorithms are more correlated. They also have the incentive to strategically decrease the precision of their targeting policies in order to reduce competition. If firms endogenously choose their algorithmic correlation, then there is an equilibrium incentive to decrease the correlation. © 2026, INFORMS
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Marketing Science |
| Online published | 23 Mar 2026 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Online published - 23 Mar 2026 |
Funding
Author names are listed in alphabetical order. The authors thank the senior editor, associate editor, two anonymous reviewers, Avi Goldfarb, Tony Ke, Samir Mamadehussene, Eddie Ning, and seminar participants at University of Toronto, Hong Kong Quant Marketing Brown Bag Series, and the UT Dallas Bass 2024 conference for constructive comments. All errors are the authors’ own.
Research Keywords
- precision-recall tradeoff
- targeted advertising
- machine learning
- algorithms
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Algorithmic Targeting and the Precision-Recall Tradeoff'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver