Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Air Pollution Control: Comparative Analysis of VOC Regulations Across Mainland China, the EU, and the US

  • C. K. Law*
  • , Savannah Y. T. Lai
  • , Joseph H. K. Lai
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

3 Downloads (CityUHK Scholars)

Abstract

Air pollution, especially the rising ground-level ozone (O3) levels, poses a critical global challenge to public health and environmental sustainability. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs), which are key precursors to O3 formation, are primarily emitted from various household chemical products. Given the lack of a thorough understanding of the current regulatory control on VOC emissions and the need to identify ways to curb these emissions, a comparative analysis was conducted on the VOC regulations across three major economies: Mainland China, the European Union (EU), and the United States. The analysis reveals distinct regulatory frameworks and approaches: (i) the United States exemplifies a robust control framework characterized by detailed product categorization, stringent VOC limits, and many control parameters; (ii) the EU adopts a relatively streamlined approach, primarily targeting certain types of architectural paints and relying on ecolabel for specific cleaning products; and (iii) Mainland China employs a broad regulatory approach, permitting a range of solvent-borne products with comparatively lenient VOC limits, while tightening penalty mechanisms and broadening the scope of regulated entities. Comparatively, the EU and Mainland China place less emphasis on governing consumer products such as air fresheners, while the United States and Mainland China implement the polluter-pays principle, including VOC taxes. In addition to forging international collaboration to enhance cross-border regulatory control of VOCs, future work is needed to explore establishing stricter emission standards, implementing comprehensive bans on specific high-VOC products, and providing financial incentives and technological upgrades for the transition to low-VOC alternatives. © 2025 C. K. Law et al.
Original languageEnglish
Article number6743635
Number of pages24
JournalIndoor Air
Volume2025
Online published26 Sept 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2025

Funding

No funding was received for this manuscript.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
  2. SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production
    SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
  3. SDG 17 - Partnerships for the Goals
    SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals

Research Keywords

  • air pollution control
  • ozone
  • regulation
  • VOC content
  • volatile organic compound

Publisher's Copyright Statement

  • This full text is made available under CC-BY 4.0. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Air Pollution Control: Comparative Analysis of VOC Regulations Across Mainland China, the EU, and the US'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this