Agency Reasoning - A Formula or a Tool?
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews (RGC: 21, 22, 62) › 21_Publication in refereed journal › peer-review
Author(s)
Detail(s)
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 43-56 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Journal / Publication | Singapore Journal of Legal Studies |
Publication status | Published - Mar 2018 |
Externally published | Yes |
Link(s)
Permanent Link | https://scholars.cityu.edu.hk/en/publications/publication(2a7aa854-c6c0-4ed6-a61f-ee90244efa92).html |
---|
Abstract
Holmes expressed doubts about the viability of Agency as a subject. This paper suggests that the law of Agency has a valid central core providing for the external powers of agents and their internal relations with their principals, surrounded by a considerable number of areas where agency principles are applied, but incompletely. There is a progression from the more central cases to situations where the agency analogy is weak or even sometimes misleading. In these extended applications it can be said that agency reasoning is only a tool requiring to be used with caution or even not used at all: but when the tool is acceptably used, features of the core of agency reasoning are still recognisably present.
Citation Format(s)
Agency Reasoning - A Formula or a Tool? / Reynolds, Francis; Tan, Cheng-Han.
In: Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, 03.2018, p. 43-56.
In: Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, 03.2018, p. 43-56.
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews (RGC: 21, 22, 62) › 21_Publication in refereed journal › peer-review