Abstract
Department of Asian and International Studies, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong ABSTRACT A decade after the Asian financial and economic crisis, assessments can be made about the varying capacities of different political regimes to withstand economic shocks. This paper shows that Malaysia's hybrid approach to authoritarianism has been most resilient, Indonesia's harder authoritarian rule was most brittle, and Thailand's democratic politics displayed an intermediate level of sturdiness, hence delaying - but not preventing - their breakdown. However, this paper argues also that in trying to explain these varying amounts of resilience, it is not enough to examine the institutions and procedures of which regimes are composed. Instead, in taking a political economy approach, attention is given to prior patterns of capital ownership involving the state, indigenous tycoons, ethnic Chinese entrepreneurs and foreign investors. © 2009 Journal of Contemporary Asia.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 649-672 |
| Journal | Journal of Contemporary Asia |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Nov 2009 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
-
SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals
Research Keywords
- Capital ownership
- Elites
- Ethnicity
- Financial crisis
- Institutions
- Regimes
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'After the Crisis: Capital and regime resilience in the ASEAN Three'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver