Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

After the Crisis: Capital and regime resilience in the ASEAN Three

    Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

    Abstract

    Department of Asian and International Studies, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong ABSTRACT A decade after the Asian financial and economic crisis, assessments can be made about the varying capacities of different political regimes to withstand economic shocks. This paper shows that Malaysia's hybrid approach to authoritarianism has been most resilient, Indonesia's harder authoritarian rule was most brittle, and Thailand's democratic politics displayed an intermediate level of sturdiness, hence delaying - but not preventing - their breakdown. However, this paper argues also that in trying to explain these varying amounts of resilience, it is not enough to examine the institutions and procedures of which regimes are composed. Instead, in taking a political economy approach, attention is given to prior patterns of capital ownership involving the state, indigenous tycoons, ethnic Chinese entrepreneurs and foreign investors. © 2009 Journal of Contemporary Asia.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)649-672
    JournalJournal of Contemporary Asia
    Volume39
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Nov 2009

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities
      SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
    2. SDG 17 - Partnerships for the Goals
      SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals

    Research Keywords

    • Capital ownership
    • Elites
    • Ethnicity
    • Financial crisis
    • Institutions
    • Regimes

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'After the Crisis: Capital and regime resilience in the ASEAN Three'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this