Abstract
Recent studies reveal that reconstruction of close-packed metal surfaces induced by C 60 adsorption is the rule rather than the exception. Two types of reconstruction are reported for C 60 on different surfaces: (1) C 60 sinks into a 7-atom hole, such as on Cu(111); and (2) C 60 sits over a 1-atom hole, such as on Ag(111) and Pt(111). An explanation for the preferred reconstruction type for different metals has been lacking. Here, we propose a criterion that predicts which reconstruction type should be expected: Namely, the formation of a 1- or 7-atom hole is determined only by the substrate geometric structure, including the surface lattice constant and the interlayer spacing; remarkably, the reconstruction type appears not to depend on the substrate electronic structure. Our intuitive geometrical explanation is validated by comparative first-principles calculations of the energetics of C 60 on Cu(111), Ru(0001), Pt(111), and Ag(111) surfaces, listed here with increasing surface lattice constant. This provides a uniform explanation for the different reconstruction types that are observed experimentally for C 60 on different close-packed metal surfaces. Moreover, our results provide a better explanation for the decomposition behavior of C 60 on Ru(0001). © 2012 American Physical Society.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 75421 |
| Journal | Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics |
| Volume | 85 |
| Issue number | 7 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 21 Feb 2012 |
Publisher's Copyright Statement
- COPYRIGHT TERMS OF DEPOSITED FINAL PUBLISHED VERSION FILE: Shi, X-Q., Van Hove, M. A., & Zhang, R-Q. (2012). Adsorbate-induced reconstruction by C 60 on close-packed metal surfaces: Mechanism for different types of reconstruction. Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, 85(7), [75421]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.85.075421. The copyright of this article is owned by American Physical Society.