Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Administrative Values in the Mainland Chinese and Hong Kong Public Services: A Comparative Analysis

Ian Scott*, Ting Gong

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

    Abstract

    Public bureaucracies shape the values of their officials in ways that affect performance and behaviour. By contrasting those administrative values in mainland China and Hong Kong and how they impact on such issues as attitudes towards the organisation, superior–subordinate relationships, conflict and conflict avoidance and responsiveness to change, the character of the bureaucracy and the dynamics of interactions within it can be better understood. From the findings, the most important determinant of differences is that the prevailing conception on the mainland is of a bureaucracy where authority is lodged in the person (“rule of man”), whereas in Hong Kong, Weberian bureaucracy (“rule of law”) is the dominant form. The study draws both on quantitative material derived from the same survey conducted among senior civil servants on the mainland and in Hong Kong and on qualitative material from interviews with officials.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)22-33
    JournalAsia Pacific Journal of Public Administration
    Volume36
    Issue number1
    Online published24 Mar 2014
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
      SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

    Research Keywords

    • administrative value
    • rule of law
    • conflict
    • superior–subordinate relationships
    • responsiveness

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Administrative Values in the Mainland Chinese and Hong Kong Public Services: A Comparative Analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this