Abstract
Based on an analysis of national statistics and fieldwork interviews, this article argues that administrative disputes have been channelled in two ways: first, administrative reconsideration is used to resolve disputes that the court is incapable of handling and, second, a large volume of highly influential cases are ending up in administrative reconsideration. The development of judicial power and judicialization is thus substantially constrained. The seemingly favorable outcome for the plaintiffs in administrative litigation does not reveal a process of judicialization; rather, it is a result of the corrosion of administrative reconsideration on administrative litigation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 252–269 |
| Journal | The Chinese Journal of Comparative Law |
| Volume | 2 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Online published | 20 Sept 2014 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Oct 2014 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Administrative Reconsideration’s Erosion of Administrative Litigation in China'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver