Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Administrative Reconsideration’s Erosion of Administrative Litigation in China

  • Xin He*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

Abstract

Based on an analysis of national statistics and fieldwork interviews, this article argues that administrative disputes have been channelled in two ways: first, administrative reconsideration is used to resolve disputes that the court is incapable of handling and, second, a large volume of highly influential cases are ending up in administrative reconsideration. The development of judicial power and judicialization is thus substantially constrained. The seemingly favorable outcome for the plaintiffs in administrative litigation does not reveal a process of judicialization; rather, it is a result of the corrosion of administrative reconsideration on administrative litigation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)252–269
JournalThe Chinese Journal of Comparative Law
Volume2
Issue number2
Online published20 Sept 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2014

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Administrative Reconsideration’s Erosion of Administrative Litigation in China'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this