Active animal health surveillance in European Union Member States : Gaps and opportunities

Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews (RGC: 21, 22, 62)21_Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

11 Scopus Citations
View graph of relations

Author(s)

  • B. Bisdorff
  • B. Schauer
  • N. Taylor
  • V. Rodríguez-Prieto
  • A. Comin
  • A. Brouwer
  • F. Dórea
  • J. Drewe
  • L. Hoinville
  • A. Lindberg
  • M. Martinez Avilés
  • B. Martínez-López
  • M. Peyre
  • J. Pinto Ferreira
  • J. Rushton
  • G. Van Schaik
  • K. D C Stärk
  • C. Staubach
  • M. Vicente-Rubiano
  • G. Witteveen
  • B. Häsler

Detail(s)

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)802-817
Journal / PublicationEpidemiology and Infection
Volume145
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2017
Externally publishedYes

Abstract

Animal health surveillance enables the detection and control of animal diseases including zoonoses. Under the EU-FP7 project RISKSUR, a survey was conducted in 11 EU Member States and Switzerland to describe active surveillance components in 2011 managed by the public or private sector and identify gaps and opportunities. Information was collected about hazard, target population, geographical focus, legal obligation, management, surveillance design, risk-based sampling, and multi-hazard surveillance. Two countries were excluded due to incompleteness of data. Most of the 664 components targeted cattle (26.7%), pigs (17.5%) or poultry (16.0%). The most common surveillance objectives were demonstrating freedom from disease (43.8%) and case detection (26.8%). Over half of components applied risk-based sampling (57.1%), but mainly focused on a single population stratum (targeted risk-based) rather than differentiating between risk levels of different strata (stratified risk-based). About a third of components were multi-hazard (37.3%). Both risk-based sampling and multi-hazard surveillance were used more frequently in privately funded components. The study identified several gaps (e.g. lack of systematic documentation, inconsistent application of terminology) and opportunities (e.g. stratified risk-based sampling). The greater flexibility provided by the new EU Animal Health Law means that systematic evaluation of surveillance alternatives will be required to optimize cost-effectiveness.

Research Area(s)

  • EU Animal Health Law, One Health, risk-based, RISKSUR, surveillance component

Citation Format(s)

Active animal health surveillance in European Union Member States : Gaps and opportunities. / Bisdorff, B.; Schauer, B.; Taylor, N.; Rodríguez-Prieto, V.; Comin, A.; Brouwer, A.; Dórea, F.; Drewe, J.; Hoinville, L.; Lindberg, A.; Martinez Avilés, M.; Martínez-López, B.; Peyre, M.; Pinto Ferreira, J.; Rushton, J.; Van Schaik, G.; Stärk, K. D C; Staubach, C.; Vicente-Rubiano, M.; Witteveen, G.; Pfeiffer, D.; Häsler, B.

In: Epidemiology and Infection, Vol. 145, No. 4, 01.03.2017, p. 802-817.

Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews (RGC: 21, 22, 62)21_Publication in refereed journalpeer-review