Accounting for a lame cow
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews (RGC: 21, 22, 62) › 62_Review of books or of software (or similar publications/items) › peer-review
Related Research Unit(s)
|Journal / Publication||In Practice|
|Online published||1 Oct 2015|
|Publication status||Published - Oct 2015|
|Link to Scopus||https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84943246619&origin=recordpage|
THIS series gives readers the opportunity to consider and contribute to discussion of some of the ethical dilemmas that can arise in veterinary practice. Each month, a case scenario is presented, followed by discussion of some of the issues involved. In addition, a possible way forward is suggested; however, there is rarely a cut-anddried answer in such cases, and readers may wish to suggest an alternative approach. This month's dilemma, 'Accounting for a lame cow', was submitted and is discussed by Richard Brown. Readers with comments to contribute are invited to send them as soon as possible, so that they can be considered for publication in the next issue. Discussion of the dilemma '"Off colour" alpaca', which was published in the September issue of In Practice, appears on page 487. The series is being coordinated by Siobhan Mullan, of the University of Bristol. It is hoped it will provide a framework that will help practices find solutions when facing similar dilemmas.
The School of Veterinary Medicine (SVM) has been integrated under the College of Veterinary Medicine and Life Sciences (CVMLS) since July 2017.