Acclimation effect and fitness cost of copper resistance in the marine copepod Tigriopus japonicus
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review
Author(s)
Detail(s)
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 358-364 |
Journal / Publication | Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety |
Volume | 72 |
Issue number | 2 |
Online published | 7 Oct 2008 |
Publication status | Published - Feb 2009 |
Externally published | Yes |
Link(s)
Abstract
Copper (Cu) contamination is common and widespread in coastal marine environments. This study used the marine copepod Tigriopus japonicus to test whether Cu resistance can be developed through multigeneration acclimation to elevated Cu levels and whether the resistance has a fitness cost. T. japonicus (F0) were acclimated to three Cu concentrations (0, 10, and 100 μg l-1) and offspring (F1 and F2) of each treatment were subsequently acclimated at these three concentrations, respectively. Our results evidently indicated that Cu resistance of the copepod was increased even after one generation of acclimation to 100 μg Cu l-1. The acquired Cu resistance had a fitness cost, as the intrinsic population growth rate of this Cu resistant lineage was significantly lower than the control. The Cu resistance of the offspring from Cu resistant copepods, when raised under control conditions, returned to a level comparable to the control implying a plastic physiological adaptation. © 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Research Area(s)
- Evolution, Intrinsic growth rate, Life table analysis, Trade-off
Citation Format(s)
Acclimation effect and fitness cost of copper resistance in the marine copepod Tigriopus japonicus. / Kwok, Kevin W.H.; Grist, Eric P.M.; Leung, Kenneth M.Y.
In: Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, Vol. 72, No. 2, 02.2009, p. 358-364.
In: Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, Vol. 72, No. 2, 02.2009, p. 358-364.
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review