Abstract
Drawing on fieldwork investigations of shoe manufacturers in southeastern China, this article provides empirical evidence for understanding these business' taxpaying practices. We find that since the legitimacy of tax law is largely absent amongst business taxpayers, instrumental considerations dominate taxpayers' decisions to pay or not pay taxes. We then incorporate “structural opportunities for evasion” and “perceived costs of evasion” to develop a two‐by‐two matrix to understand the following types of behavior: aggressive evasion, obliged compliance, strategic compliance, and reciprocal compliance. We argue that the matrix explains why VAT (value added tax) fraud is widespread in China while voluntary compliance is rare. It also helps to illuminate compliance more generally in developing economies.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 242-266 |
| Journal | Law & Policy |
| Volume | 41 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Online published | 3 Apr 2019 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Apr 2019 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals
Policy Impact
- Cited in Policy Documents
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A Typology of Tax Compliance in Developing Economies: Empirical Evidence from China's Shoe Industry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver