Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A simple method for estimating the relative stabilities of compounds with the same empirical formula

  • Hongwei Zhou
  • , Ning-Bew Wong
  • , Ge Zhou
  • , Anmin Tian

    Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

    Abstract

    A simple method is developed to estimate the relative stabilities of compounds with the same empirical formula. Totally 126 compounds in three test sets are studied in total energies, group energies (GEs), heats of formation (ΔHf), and group ΔHf (GHOFs). Theoretical analysis and computational results show that the orders of the relative stabilities of the 126 compounds are consistent both in GEs and GHOFs whether they are isomers or not, indicating that the relative stabilities of compounds with the same empirical formula can be estimated using the GEs, which are easier obtainable than the GHOFs. © 2006.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)127-136
    JournalJournal of Molecular Structure: THEOCHEM
    Volume765
    Issue number1-3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 15 Jun 2006

    Bibliographical note

    Publication details (e.g. title, author(s), publication statuses and dates) are captured on an “AS IS” and “AS AVAILABLE” basis at the time of record harvesting from the data source. Suggestions for further amendments or supplementary information can be sent to [email protected].

    Funding

    This work was supported by the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong (account no. 9040979 (CityU 102404)), the National Science Foundation of China (account no. 20373045) and Special Research Foundation of Doctoral Education of Chinese University (account no. 20020610024).

    Research Keywords

    • Empirical formula
    • Energy
    • Heats of formation
    • Stability

    RGC Funding Information

    • RGC-funded

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A simple method for estimating the relative stabilities of compounds with the same empirical formula'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this