Abstract
Existing theories and doctrines of free speech have focused on why the freedom to express is indispensable for realizing the values that we treasure, such as truth or democracy. However, how expression facilitates those values is underexplored. This Article proposes a doctrinal framework of free speech consisting of four parts: right of control over one’s information, right to know, right of access to platforms, and behavioral rules of public discussion. These are the constitutive parts that are necessary for the exercise of free speech to be meaningful and effective. After elaborating on these elements, this Article tests the framework by analyzing four cases: the European Union’s Right to Be Forgotten, the information disclosure laws of China, the blocking of Trump’s Twitter account, and the Indian hate speech incident. Those four cases offer a more comprehensive scenario as to how the quadruple framework operates in real contexts.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 467-516 |
| Number of pages | 50 |
| Journal | Columbia Human Rights Law Review |
| Volume | 53 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Online published | Feb 2022 |
| Publication status | Published - 2022 |
| Externally published | Yes |