A mixed-method study on antimicrobial resistance infection drivers in neonatal intensive care units: pathways, risks, and solutions

Almaw Genet Yeshiwas (Co-first Author), Gashaw Melkie Bayeh, Tilahun Degu Tsega, Sintayehu Simie Tsega, Asaye Alamneh Gebeyehu, Zufan Alamrie Asmare, Rahel Mulatie Anteneh, Amare Genetu Ejigu, Ahmed Fentaw Ahmed, Zeamanuel Anteneh Yigzaw, Abathun Temesgen, Anley Shiferaw Enawgaw, Getasew Yirdaw, Wosenyelesh Desalegn, Chalachew Yenew (Co-first Author)

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

6 Downloads (CityUHK Scholars)

Abstract

Background Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) complicates treatment of healthcare-associated infections, causing high morbidity and mortality, especially among low-birth-weight and critically ill infants. This study evaluates AMR prevalence, risk factors, outcomes and infection control measures at Felege Hiwot Hospital, aiming to guide clinical practices, antimicrobial stewardship, and improved neonatal health outcomes.

Methods This mixed-methods study (Oct 2022–Jun 2023) assessed AMR in NICU neonates by analyzing 420 blood samples, environmental swabs, and staff insights. Bivariable and multivariable regressions identified significant variables, and content analysis was used for qualitative data.

Results Out of 420 samples, 35% tested positive for AMR pathogens, with Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci (16.7%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (12.9%), and Acinetobacter spp. (5.6%) being the most prevalent. Resistance rates for Gentamicin, Cotrimoxazole, and Ciprofloxacin were alarmingly high (98–100%), while Amikacin demonstrated low resistance (3.0-5.56%), indicating potential efficacy. Among the neonates admitted, 91.8% survived, and 8.2% succumbed. Risk factor analysis revealed that improper PPE usage (AOR 3.90, p<0.001), non-functional handwashing sinks (AOR 3.20, p<0.001), and inadequate disinfection practices (AOR 2.70, p<0.001) were strongly associated with microbial contamination. Environmental factors, including cockroach presence (AOR 1.80, p=0.040) and high traffic flow (AOR 2.10, p=0.005), were also significant contributors. The qualitative data analysis confirmed that improper PPE use, inadequate disinfection practices, pest control challenges, and non-functional handwashing sinks significantly contributed to microbial contamination risks in the NICU, aligning with the quantitative findings.

Conclusions This study underscores key factors driving AMR in NICUs, such as inadequate IPC practices and environmental contamination, alongside high resistance to Cotrimoxazole and Ciprofloxacin. Amikacin shows promise as an effective treatment for CONS. Urgent actions, including strengthened IPC measures, staff training, and environmental management, are crucial to combat AMR, ensuring improved neonatal care and outcomes.

© The Author(s) 2025. 
Original languageEnglish
Article number15
JournalAntimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control
Volume14
Online published21 Feb 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2025
Externally publishedYes

Funding

There is no fund received from any organization to conduct this study. However, expense for data collection was covered by principal investigator.

Research Keywords

  • Antimicrobial resistance (AMR)
  • NICU
  • Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CONS)
  • Infection prevention and control (IPC)
  • Amikacin

Publisher's Copyright Statement

  • This full text is made available under CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A mixed-method study on antimicrobial resistance infection drivers in neonatal intensive care units: pathways, risks, and solutions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this