Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A low-molecular-weight oil cleaner for removal of leftover silicone oil intraocular Tamponade

Yau Kei Chan, David Wong, Hiu Kwan Yeung, Ping Kwan Man, Ho Cheung Shum*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

Abstract

PURPOSE. Silicone oil (SO) has been used as a long-term intraocular tamponade in treating retinal diseases for more than half a decade. However, its propensity to form tiny SO droplets is associated with a number of complications. Currently there is no effective way to remove such droplets from the eye cavity. In this work, a novel cleaner was developed for effective removal of these droplets. METHODS. The cleaner promotes the formation of an oil-in-water-in-oil (O/W/O) doubleemulsion that consists of the unwanted droplets as the innermost oil phase. The cleaner’s ability to encapsulate SO droplets was tested using both in vitro microdevices and ex vivo porcine eye models. The efficiency of the cleaner in removing the SO droplets was quantified using the three-dimensional (3D) printed eye model. Both the volatility and in vitro cytotoxicity of the cleaner were evaluated on three retinal cell lines. RESULTS. Cleaner 1.0 is volatile and has an evaporation rate of 0.14 mL/h at room temperature. The formation of O/W/O double-emulsion indicates the encapsulation of SO droplets by the cleaner. In the 3D printed eye model, rinsing with cleaner 1.0 led to a significant reduction of leftover SO droplets compared with 13 phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; P < 0.05; n ¼ 6). Cleaner 1.0 did not cause significant cell death (3%–6%) compared with balance salt solution (BSS; 1%–3%) in all three cell lines. The reduction in the cell viability due to cleaner 1.0, relative to that of BSS, was significant only in ARPE-19 cells (27%; P < 0.05) but not in the other two cell lines (8% and 17%, respectively; P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS. The double-emulsification approach was effective in removing remnant droplets from the eye cavities, and the cleaner was compatible with common cell types encountered in human eyes. The mechanism of toxicity of the proposed cleaner is still unknown, therefore, further in vivo animal tests are needed for full evaluation of the physiological response before the proposed cleaner can be advanced to clinical trials for retinal surgeries. © 2015 The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1014-1022
JournalInvestigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science
Volume56
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Jan 2015
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publication details (e.g. title, author(s), publication statuses and dates) are captured on an “AS IS” and “AS AVAILABLE” basis at the time of record harvesting from the data source. Suggestions for further amendments or supplementary information can be sent to [email protected].

Funding

Supported by the Innovation and Technology Fund (ITS/105/13, InP/319/13, InP/31/13). Partially supported by the Early Career Scheme (HKU 707712P) and the General Research Fund (HKU 719813E and 17304514) from the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong, as well as the General Program (21476189/B060201) and Young Scholar's Program (NSFC51206138/E0605) from the National Natural Science Foundation of China.

Research Keywords

  • Double emulsion
  • Emulsification
  • Encapsulation
  • Silicone oil
  • Vitreoretinal surgery

RGC Funding Information

  • RGC-funded

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A low-molecular-weight oil cleaner for removal of leftover silicone oil intraocular Tamponade'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this