A first field evaluation of heavy metals uptake by innovative artificial mussel (AM) technology versus live mussel (LM) from inshore of the Bay of Bengal, Bangladesh and the application of AM technology for global pollution study

Debbrota Mallick; Golam Kibria; Md M. Maruf Hossain; T. C. Lau; Rudolf Wu

doi:10.1016/j.rsma.2023.103337

A first field evaluation of heavy metals uptake by innovative artificial mussel (AM) technology versus live mussel (LM) from inshore of the Bay of Bengal, Bangladesh and the application of AM technology for global pollution study

Debbrota Mallick^*
, Golam Kibria^*
, Md M. Maruf Hossain
, T. C. Lau
, Rudolf Wu

^*Corresponding author for this work

Department of Chemistry

Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The comparative application of innovative artificial mussel (AM) technology together with live mussel (LM) has yet to be performed in the coastal waters of Bangladesh. Here, we report the accumulation of targeted metals (Cd, Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni, Pb, U and Zn) in both AM and LM (Perna viridi) from inshore of the Bay of Bengal, Bangladesh. AMs and LMs were deployed in two sites (MaheshKhali Channel and Reju Khal mouth, Cox's Bazar district), in the Bay of Bengal, Bangladesh for this research study. Our data suggest that the uptake of Cu, Pb and Ni have correlated positively between AM and LM. The first equilibrium phase of metal uptake in AMs was achieved around day 7 for most of the metals, and the kinetics of uptake from day 0 to day 7 is descended as follows: Zn>Fe>Mn>Ni>U>Cu>Cd>Pb. In contrast, the concentration of metals in LM has not been changed a lot from its background level and found highly enriched in Fe, Pb and U compared to AMs. The overall uptake patterns show that AM can provide precise and time-integrated metal concentrations without any biological influence associated with LMs. Based on our research, AM technology can be a good replacement for bioindicator (live mussel) to monitor heavy metals in waterways since a) all of our targeted metals were accumulated in both AM and LM; and b) both AM and LM show a similar metal uptake, in particular, the uptake of Cu, Pb, and Ni in AM was found positively correlated with LM. © 2023 Elsevier B.V.

Original language	English
Article number	103337
Journal	Regional Studies in Marine Science
Volume	69
Online published	15 Dec 2023
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsma.2023.103337
Publication status	Published - 1 Jan 2024

Funding

The work described in this paper was partly supported by a grant from the University Grants Committee of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China (AoE/P-04/04 supported AM supply and analysis, shipment of AM to and from Hong Kong). The rest of the field components including (deployment/retrieval, field, and other incidental costs, etc.) were supported by the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO)/ Bay of Bengal Large Marine Ecosystems (BoBLME) Project supported project ( FAOBGDLOA-0312014-031 ).

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

SDG 14 Life Below Water

Research Keywords

Artificial mussel
Live mussel
Perna viridis
Heavy metals
Chittagong
Bangladesh

RGC Funding Information

RGC-funded

Access Output

10.1016/j.rsma.2023.103337

Other Access Options

Check CityUHK Library

Permanent Link

Right click to copy link

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A first field evaluation of heavy metals uptake by innovative artificial mussel (AM) technology versus live mussel (LM) from inshore of the Bay of Bengal, Bangladesh and the application of AM technology for global pollution study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

Mallick, D., Kibria, G., Hossain, M. M. M., Lau, T. C., & Wu, R. (2024). A first field evaluation of heavy metals uptake by innovative artificial mussel (AM) technology versus live mussel (LM) from inshore of the Bay of Bengal, Bangladesh and the application of AM technology for global pollution study. Regional Studies in Marine Science, 69, Article 103337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsma.2023.103337

@article{f093d6f255bc4ad1b4e397f9e49ca0fa,

title = "A first field evaluation of heavy metals uptake by innovative artificial mussel (AM) technology versus live mussel (LM) from inshore of the Bay of Bengal, Bangladesh and the application of AM technology for global pollution study",

abstract = "The comparative application of innovative artificial mussel (AM) technology together with live mussel (LM) has yet to be performed in the coastal waters of Bangladesh. Here, we report the accumulation of targeted metals (Cd, Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni, Pb, U and Zn) in both AM and LM (Perna viridi) from inshore of the Bay of Bengal, Bangladesh. AMs and LMs were deployed in two sites (MaheshKhali Channel and Reju Khal mouth, Cox's Bazar district), in the Bay of Bengal, Bangladesh for this research study. Our data suggest that the uptake of Cu, Pb and Ni have correlated positively between AM and LM. The first equilibrium phase of metal uptake in AMs was achieved around day 7 for most of the metals, and the kinetics of uptake from day 0 to day 7 is descended as follows: Zn>Fe>Mn>Ni>U>Cu>Cd>Pb. In contrast, the concentration of metals in LM has not been changed a lot from its background level and found highly enriched in Fe, Pb and U compared to AMs. The overall uptake patterns show that AM can provide precise and time-integrated metal concentrations without any biological influence associated with LMs. Based on our research, AM technology can be a good replacement for bioindicator (live mussel) to monitor heavy metals in waterways since a) all of our targeted metals were accumulated in both AM and LM; and b) both AM and LM show a similar metal uptake, in particular, the uptake of Cu, Pb, and Ni in AM was found positively correlated with LM. {\textcopyright} 2023 Elsevier B.V.",

keywords = "Artificial mussel, Live mussel, Perna viridis, Heavy metals, Chittagong, Bangladesh",

author = "Debbrota Mallick and Golam Kibria and Hossain, \{Md M. Maruf\} and Lau, \{T. C.\} and Rudolf Wu",

year = "2024",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/j.rsma.2023.103337",

language = "English",

volume = "69",

journal = "Regional Studies in Marine Science",

issn = "2352-4855",

publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",

}

Mallick, D, Kibria, G, Hossain, MMM, Lau, TC & Wu, R 2024, 'A first field evaluation of heavy metals uptake by innovative artificial mussel (AM) technology versus live mussel (LM) from inshore of the Bay of Bengal, Bangladesh and the application of AM technology for global pollution study', Regional Studies in Marine Science, vol. 69, 103337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsma.2023.103337

A first field evaluation of heavy metals uptake by innovative artificial mussel (AM) technology versus live mussel (LM) from inshore of the Bay of Bengal, Bangladesh and the application of AM technology for global pollution study. / Mallick, Debbrota; Kibria, Golam; Hossain, Md M. Maruf et al.
In: Regional Studies in Marine Science, Vol. 69, 103337, 01.01.2024.

Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A first field evaluation of heavy metals uptake by innovative artificial mussel (AM) technology versus live mussel (LM) from inshore of the Bay of Bengal, Bangladesh and the application of AM technology for global pollution study

AU - Mallick, Debbrota

AU - Kibria, Golam

AU - Hossain, Md M. Maruf

AU - Lau, T. C.

AU - Wu, Rudolf

PY - 2024/1/1

Y1 - 2024/1/1

N2 - The comparative application of innovative artificial mussel (AM) technology together with live mussel (LM) has yet to be performed in the coastal waters of Bangladesh. Here, we report the accumulation of targeted metals (Cd, Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni, Pb, U and Zn) in both AM and LM (Perna viridi) from inshore of the Bay of Bengal, Bangladesh. AMs and LMs were deployed in two sites (MaheshKhali Channel and Reju Khal mouth, Cox's Bazar district), in the Bay of Bengal, Bangladesh for this research study. Our data suggest that the uptake of Cu, Pb and Ni have correlated positively between AM and LM. The first equilibrium phase of metal uptake in AMs was achieved around day 7 for most of the metals, and the kinetics of uptake from day 0 to day 7 is descended as follows: Zn>Fe>Mn>Ni>U>Cu>Cd>Pb. In contrast, the concentration of metals in LM has not been changed a lot from its background level and found highly enriched in Fe, Pb and U compared to AMs. The overall uptake patterns show that AM can provide precise and time-integrated metal concentrations without any biological influence associated with LMs. Based on our research, AM technology can be a good replacement for bioindicator (live mussel) to monitor heavy metals in waterways since a) all of our targeted metals were accumulated in both AM and LM; and b) both AM and LM show a similar metal uptake, in particular, the uptake of Cu, Pb, and Ni in AM was found positively correlated with LM. © 2023 Elsevier B.V.

AB - The comparative application of innovative artificial mussel (AM) technology together with live mussel (LM) has yet to be performed in the coastal waters of Bangladesh. Here, we report the accumulation of targeted metals (Cd, Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni, Pb, U and Zn) in both AM and LM (Perna viridi) from inshore of the Bay of Bengal, Bangladesh. AMs and LMs were deployed in two sites (MaheshKhali Channel and Reju Khal mouth, Cox's Bazar district), in the Bay of Bengal, Bangladesh for this research study. Our data suggest that the uptake of Cu, Pb and Ni have correlated positively between AM and LM. The first equilibrium phase of metal uptake in AMs was achieved around day 7 for most of the metals, and the kinetics of uptake from day 0 to day 7 is descended as follows: Zn>Fe>Mn>Ni>U>Cu>Cd>Pb. In contrast, the concentration of metals in LM has not been changed a lot from its background level and found highly enriched in Fe, Pb and U compared to AMs. The overall uptake patterns show that AM can provide precise and time-integrated metal concentrations without any biological influence associated with LMs. Based on our research, AM technology can be a good replacement for bioindicator (live mussel) to monitor heavy metals in waterways since a) all of our targeted metals were accumulated in both AM and LM; and b) both AM and LM show a similar metal uptake, in particular, the uptake of Cu, Pb, and Ni in AM was found positively correlated with LM. © 2023 Elsevier B.V.

KW - Artificial mussel

KW - Live mussel

KW - Perna viridis

KW - Heavy metals

KW - Chittagong

KW - Bangladesh

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85183763746

UR - https://www.scopus.com/record/pubmetrics.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85183763746&origin=recordpage

U2 - 10.1016/j.rsma.2023.103337

DO - 10.1016/j.rsma.2023.103337

M3 - RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal

SN - 2352-4855

VL - 69

JO - Regional Studies in Marine Science

JF - Regional Studies in Marine Science

M1 - 103337

ER -

Mallick D, Kibria G, Hossain MMM, Lau TC, Wu R. A first field evaluation of heavy metals uptake by innovative artificial mussel (AM) technology versus live mussel (LM) from inshore of the Bay of Bengal, Bangladesh and the application of AM technology for global pollution study. Regional Studies in Marine Science. 2024 Jan 1;69:103337. Epub 2023 Dec 15. doi: 10.1016/j.rsma.2023.103337

A first field evaluation of heavy metals uptake by innovative artificial mussel (AM) technology versus live mussel (LM) from inshore of the Bay of Bengal, Bangladesh and the application of AM technology for global pollution study

Abstract

Funding

UN SDGs

Research Keywords

RGC Funding Information

Access Output

Other Access Options

Permanent Link

Other Files and Links

Fingerprint

Cite this