Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A critical look at Taguchi's modelling approach for robust design

  • Kwok-Leung Tsui

Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review

Abstract

The objective of Taguchi's robust design method is to reduce the output variation from the target (the desired output) by making the performance insensitive to noise, such as manufacturing imperfections, environmental variations and deterioration. This objective has been recognized to be very effective in improving product and manufacturing process design. In application, however, Taguchi's analysis approach of modelling the average loss (or signal-to-noise ratios) may lead to non-optimal solutions, efficiency loss and information loss. In addition, since his modelling loss approach requires a special experimental format that contains a cross-product of two separate arrays for control and noise factors, this leads to less flexible and unnecessarily expensive experiments. The response model approach, an alternative approach proposed by Welch et al., Box and Jones, Lucas and Shoemaker et al., does not have these problems. However, this alternative approach also has its own problems. This paper reviews and discusses the potential problems of Taguchi's modelling approach. We illustrate these problems with examples and numerical studies. We also compare the advantages and disadvantages of Taguchi's approach and the alternative approach.

© 1996 Journals Oxford Ltd
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)81-95
JournalJournal of Applied Statistics
Volume23
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1996
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 9 - Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
    SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A critical look at Taguchi's modelling approach for robust design'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this