A comparative study of the porous TiNi shape-memory alloys fabricated by three different processes
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews (RGC: 21, 22, 62) › 21_Publication in refereed journal › peer-review
Author(s)
Detail(s)
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 755-761 |
Journal / Publication | Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A: Physical Metallurgy and Materials Science |
Volume | 37 |
Issue number | 3 |
Publication status | Published - Mar 2006 |
Link(s)
Abstract
Porous TiNi shape-memory alloys (SMAs) have been successfully fabricated by three different processes, including capsule-free hot isostatic pressing (CF-HIP), conventional sintering (CS), and self-propagating high-temperature synthesis (SHS). A systematically comparative investigation was made on their phase transformation behaviors, mechanical properties, superelasticity, and damping performance. The results show that the CF-HIP process is the best among these methods. By controlling the processing parameters of CF-HIP, the porous TiNi SMA shows the expected pore characteristics, such as a round pore shape and a homogeneous pore distribution. The porous TiNi SMA produced by CF-HIP also exhibits good properties, such as superior superelasticity (up to 4 pct recoverable strain), a flat stress yield plateau, and a high compressive strength, similar to those of the dense TiNi SMAs. In addition, the porous TiNi SMA produced by CF-HIP has a much smaller strain hysteresis, superior damping performance to a porous TiNi SMAs produced with CS, and SHS.
Citation Format(s)
A comparative study of the porous TiNi shape-memory alloys fabricated by three different processes. / Yuan, B.; Zhang, X. P.; Chung, C. Y. et al.
In: Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A: Physical Metallurgy and Materials Science, Vol. 37, No. 3, 03.2006, p. 755-761.
In: Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A: Physical Metallurgy and Materials Science, Vol. 37, No. 3, 03.2006, p. 755-761.
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews (RGC: 21, 22, 62) › 21_Publication in refereed journal › peer-review