A comparative study of the boundary control of buck converters using first- and second-order switching surfaces -Part II: Discontinuous conduction mode

Kelvin K. S. Leung, Henry S. H. Chung

Research output: Chapters, Conference Papers, Creative and Literary WorksRGC 32 - Refereed conference paper (with host publication)peer-review

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper extends the scope of the Part-I companion paper on comparing the performance characteristics of buck converters with the first- (σ1) and second-order (σ2) switching surfaces. Major emphasis is given to converters operating in discontinuous conduction mode (DCM). Similar to the companion paper, performance attributes under investigation in this paper includes the average output voltage, output ripple voltage, switching frequency, parametric sensitivities to the component values, and large-signal characteristics. Due to the presence of the output hysteresis band, an additional switching boundary formed by the zero-inductor-current trajectory is created. This phenomenon causes a shift of the operating point in converters with σ1. Conversely, the operating point remains unchanged in converters with σ2. As well as in continuous conduction mode (CCM), σ2 can make the converter revert to the steady state in two switching cycles in DCM and gives better static and dynamic responses than σ1 in both CCM and DCM Most importantly, its control law and settings are the same in both modes. Experimental results of a prototype are found to be in good agreement with theoretical predictions. © 2005 IEEE.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationPESC Record - IEEE Annual Power Electronics Specialists Conference
Pages2126-2132
Volume2005
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Publication series

Name
Volume2005
ISSN (Print)0275-9306

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A comparative study of the boundary control of buck converters using first- and second-order switching surfaces -Part II: Discontinuous conduction mode'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this