Abstract
According to European law the '50+1'-rule of the German Football-League gets criticized due to its potential violation of competition regulations, the principles of free movement of capital and freedom of establishment. It is argued that it acts as a deterrent for potential investors. In this study we argue for a comprehensive approach, with due consideration given to economic and social aspects, towards ensuring football's integrity as well as a link between grassroots and elite level football in Europe. Using existing legislation and association guidelines of the European Big 5 leagues as a backdrop, we identify a legal form that complies with the principle of free movement of capital as required by European law. We also discuss a list of corresponding measures that includes a ban on multiownership, decentralized marketing of television rights with a subsequent redistribution, an orientation towards international accounting principles, and the introduction of a salary cap which goes in line with the motives of the '50+1'-rule.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 3-33 |
| Journal | Sport und Gesellschaft |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Apr 2014 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publication details (e.g. title, author(s), publication statuses and dates) are captured on an “AS IS” and “AS AVAILABLE” basis at the time of record harvesting from the data source. Suggestions for further amendments or supplementary information can be sent to [email protected].Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of ''50+1-rule in German football- A reform proposal based a comparison of the European Big 5 football leagues'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver