Abstract
Based on the theory of performance feedback and performance gap and taking Beijing’s “Sue for Action” as the case, this paper uses the panel data of 333 streets and towns in Beijing from in 2019 to explore the impact of historical and social performance gaps on performance improvement. The results show that performance gap will promote government performance improvement. Specifically, social and historical performance gaps will significantly promote the performance of grassroots governments, while negative social performance gap will keep it in a state of performance degradation. In addition, compared with negative feedback, the behavior habits of grassroots governments are more inclined to hot hand effect, that is, they are more inclined to respond positively to positive performance gap and negatively to negative performance gap. The response of towns and streets to negative historical performance gap is slightly different. The above results reveal the effect of performance gap on performance improvement, and provide empirical evidence for strengthening performance management and improving grassroots governance capacity.
| Translated title of the contribution | How Does Performance Feedback Impact Performance Improvement——Evidence from the Case of “Sue for Action” in Beijing |
|---|---|
| Original language | Chinese (Simplified) |
| Pages (from-to) | 117-125 |
| Journal | 中国行政管理 |
| Issue number | 11(总第 425 期) |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Nov 2020 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Research Keywords
- 绩效反馈
- “接诉即办”
- 府际竞争
- 绩效差距
- 基层政府
- performance feedback
- “Sue for Action”
- intergovernmental competition
- performance gap
- grassroots government
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'How Does Performance Feedback Impact Performance Improvement——Evidence from the Case of “Sue for Action” in Beijing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver