Abstract
As a positive respond to the challenges of the digital age, UCITA as a legislative achievement has profound theoretical and actual value. With its "market dichotomy" and mass-market license, electronic regulation of performance and electronic self-help regime, it is actually trying to build a set of license regime which advocate "Price Discrimination Scheme" and the combination of the license contract and electronic regulation measures, to achieve the state of efficiency maximum. But this kind of theoretical efficiency maximum may conflict with the final objective of the Intellectual Property Law. Thus, in the progress of building China's copyright license regime and rebuilding our Intellectual Property Law, we should consider our national intellectual property strategy in a macroscopic perspective and perfect our fair use regime, then leave due space for the balance between copyright interests and public interests.
| Translated title of the contribution | Copyright, Electronic Regulation of Performance and Mass-market License: A Law and Economic Analysis on some specific regimes in UCITA |
|---|---|
| Original language | Chinese (Simplified) |
| Pages (from-to) | 77-84 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | 暨南學報(哲學社會科學版) |
| Volume | 33 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Sept 2011 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Copyright, Electronic Regulation of Performance and Mass-market License: A Law and Economic Analysis on some specific regimes in UCITA'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver