我国反垄断私人诉讼激励制度的建构 - 基于 636 起案件的实证分析

张雅, 黎善喆

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

Abstract

Private anti-monopoly litigations, as an effective way to safeguard the rights and interests of private entities, can make up for the deficiencies of public enforcement, provide remedies for victims, and deter monopolistic conduct. However, through an empirical analysis of 636 civil litigation cases initiated by victims since the implementation of China's Anti-Monopoly Law, it is found that private antitrust enforcement in China faces challenges such as a low case count, limited case types, low success rate, low net gains for plaintiffs, and lack of standardization in group litigation. Therefore, it is necessary to examine and address these issues from a law and economics perspective. By adopting an opt-out collective litigation regime, introducing discretionary punitive damages, and further reducing the burden of proof on plaintiffs, China’s path for incentivizing private antitrust enforcement would be reshaped. As such, plaintiffs’ expected costs would reduce, while their expected benefits and chance of success would rise.
Translated title of the contribution我國反壟斷私人訴訟激勵制度的建構 - 基於 636 起案件的實證分析
Original languageChinese (Simplified)
Pages (from-to)195-213
Number of pages19
Journal中国政法大学学报
Volume18
Issue number02
Publication statusPublished - 20 Mar 2024

Bibliographical note

Publication date information for this publication is provided by the author(s) concerned.

Research Keywords

  • 反垄断
  • 私人诉讼
  • 公共实施
  • 激励
  • 法经济学
  • Anti-monopoly
  • Private litigation
  • Public implementation
  • Incentives
  • Law and Economics

Cite this