Abstract
This paper chooses Chinese A-share listed firms in the years 2007~2014 to empirically test the impact of A and H shares cross-listing with dual auditing on domestic audit fees and audit quality. Empirical results show that, ceteris paribus, cross-listed and dual-audited companies' domestic audit fees (domestic audit quality) are (is) higher than those (that) of noncross-listed or non-dual-audited companies. Further research suggests that the main conclusion is still valid after controlling for either possible endogeneity problems or the effects of auditor characteristics; the conclusion remains robust in the subsample of observations after the dual auditing system cancellation; in addition, when the auditor is from a “Big4” audit firm, it has a negative influence on the relationship between A and H shares cross-listing with dual auditing and domestic audit fees, while the relationship between A and H shares cross-listing with dual auditing and domestic audit quality isn't affected by whether the auditor is from a “Big4” audit firm or not. The conclusion has some theoretical and practical significance for developing China's institutional environment, auditing cross-listed companies and improving audit quality.
Translated title of the contribution | The Impact of Cross-listing and Dual Auditing on Domestic Audit Fees and Audit Quality: Evidence from A and H Shares Cross-listings in China |
---|---|
Original language | Chinese (Simplified) |
Pages (from-to) | 24-34 |
Journal | 审计与经济研究 |
Volume | 32 |
Issue number | 3 (总第 175) |
Publication status | Published - 1 May 2017 |
Research Keywords
- 双重审计
- 境内审计费用
- 境内审计质量
- 审计师行业专长
- 审计师变更
- A + H 股交叉上市
- 审计意见
- dual auditing
- domestic audit fees
- domestic audit quality
- auditor professional specialty
- auditor change
- A and H Shares cross-listing
- auditor opinion