Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

中國勞動教養之流變、困境與出路: 與《公民權利與政治權利國際公約》的銜接

Translated title of the contribution: The Transformation, Predicament, Future of Re-education through Labour in China: A Study of Its Consistency with the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

Abstract

Although re-education through labour once played an important role in China, it has gradually transformed and led to its present predicament, i.e., its legality and constitutionality have been questionable. The issue of legality can be resolved through the enactment of a national law to incorporate the system of re-education through labour. The system is, however, in its nature inconsistent with the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and the rule of law principle, and should therefore be abolished. Despite its illegality and unconstitutionality, the system of re-education through has continued to exist in China until today. One essential reason is that there does not exist an effective constitutional review system in China.
Translated title of the contributionThe Transformation, Predicament, Future of Re-education through Labour in China: A Study of Its Consistency with the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
Original languageChinese (Traditional)
Pages (from-to)101-119
JournalHong Kong Journal of Social Sciences
Issue number38
Publication statusPublished - May 2010

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Research Keywords

  • China
  • Constitutional Law
  • Human Rights
  • ICCPR
  • Re-education through labour

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Transformation, Predicament, Future of Re-education through Labour in China: A Study of Its Consistency with the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this