Mismanagement of multi-storey residential building is common in Hong Kong, leading
to accelerated ageing and building dilapidation. While property management agents
(PMAs) can be employed to manage buildings on residents’ behalf, there is a lack of a
simple and consistent measure to evaluate the performance of PMAs. PMA’s
performance was commonly measured by key building performance indicators, which
could lead to wrongly ascribe a dilapidated building to the inferior performance of the
PMA.
This study aims to develop a standard method to assess and compare the performance of
PMAs. The performance of a PMA is defined as its achievement in managing the
building to the satisfaction of the residents and its endeavor to maintain the building in
a good condition. In this study, the performance of a PMA is divided into a) tangible
dimension-PMA efforts to building condition, and b) intangible dimension-the way
PMA service is delivered. A total of 300 multi-storey residential buildings in Hong Kong
will be sampled for building condition assessment. Demographic characteristics of
residents in the sample buildings and PMA’s service delivery will be collected. Using
those data, tangible dimension scores will be computed with reference to building
conditions. Other exogenous factors, including building’s inborn attributes, residents’
characteristics, and coordination mechanisms will be controlled. Intangible dimension
scores will be computed using Principal Component Analysis (PCA). Combining tangible
dimension scores and intangible scores, performance scores for PMAs in those sampled
buildings will be computed. These performance scores will be tested against the level of
management fees charged by the PMAs to determine whether the residents are
receiving value for money services from their PMAs.
The practical and research implications of the proposed study are: 1) a like-with-like
framework for comparing PMA’s performance, and 2) a potential extension to evaluate
other facility management services and for different building types.