Description of impact
5 of my papers on loot box harms, their proximity to gambling, and various approaches to regulation were separately cited in the Spanish Ministry of Consumer Affairs’ Consultation on the Bill of Law that regulates the random reward mechanisms associated with interactive leisure software products (p 24, fn 7; p 26, fn 11; p 28, fn 18; p 36, fn 43; & p 37, fn 45)Documents & Links
Related Content
-
Research output
-
ESRB’s and PEGI’s Self-Regulatory ‘Includes Random Items’ Labels Fail to Ensure Consumer Protection
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › Comment/debate
-
Probability disclosures are not enough: Reducing loot box reward complexity as a part of ethical video game design
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review
-
Drafting video game loot box regulation for dummies: a Chinese lesson
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review
-
Conceptualising the Loot Box Transaction as a Gamble Between the Purchasing Player and the Video Game Company
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › Comment/debate
-
Towards an Ethical Game Design Solution to Loot Boxes: a Commentary on King and Delfabbro
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › Comment/debate