Description
Many Indo-European languages, including Dutch and German, have grammatical gender: nouns either have masculine, feminine, or neuter gender, and that has important repercussions on grammatical agreement in phrases such as “silberner Löffel” (silverMAS spoonMAS), “silberne Gabel” (silverFEM forkFEM), or “silbernes Messer” (silverNEU knifeNEU). However, why is spoon masculine (MAS) in German (“der Löffel”), while fork is feminine (FEM) (“die Gabel”), and knife is neuter (NEU) (“das Messer”)? The answer is probably that the human cognitive system developed grammatical gender in German to subcategorize its nominal system and to bring some structure to the German mental lexicon. The psychological reality of the grammatical feature ‘gender’ has been demonstrated, e.g., in the form of the gender congruency effect. However, many languages do not have grammatical gender, such as Mandarin Chinese, but make use of classifiers. In this talk, I will show that grammatical gender and classifiers fulfill very similar functions and behave similarly in language processing. This supports claims that have been made by theoretical linguists arguing that gender and classifiers are grammatical features functioning on the same spectrum. From a cognitive perspective the interesting issue is how human cognition has been able to develop at least two different ways, i.e., gender and classifiers, to achieve similar functions in language processing, i.e., subcategorizing the nominal system of language.| Period | 2 Apr 2025 |
|---|---|
| Held at | Central South University, China |